Introduction
Adobe Stock and Shutterstock are two of the most popular stock photography websites in the market. Both platforms offer a vast collection of high-quality images, videos, and illustrations that can be used for personal or commercial purposes. In this article, we will compare Adobe Stock vs Shutterstock to help you decide which platform is best suited for your needs.
Pricing Comparison: Adobe Stock Vs Shutterstock
When it comes to stock photography, Adobe Stock and Shutterstock are two of the biggest names in the industry. Both offer a vast library of high-quality images, videos, and illustrations that can be used for various purposes, from marketing campaigns to website design. However, one of the most significant factors that businesses consider when choosing a stock photography provider is pricing. In this article, we will compare the pricing of Adobe Stock and Shutterstock to help you make an informed decision.
Adobe Stock Pricing
Adobe Stock offers two pricing plans: a standard plan and a premium plan. The standard plan costs $29.99 per month, which includes ten images per month. If you need more than ten images, you can purchase additional licenses for $2.99 each. Alternatively, you can opt for a yearly subscription, which costs $239.88 per year, or $19.99 per month.
The premium plan, on the other hand, costs $79.99 per month, which includes ten images per month. Additional licenses cost $7.99 each. A yearly subscription costs $799.92 per year, or $66.66 per month.
Both plans come with a free trial period of 30 days, during which you can download up to ten images for free.
Shutterstock Pricing
Shutterstock offers three pricing plans: a basic plan, a professional plan, and a team plan. The basic plan costs $29 per month, which includes ten images per month. Additional licenses cost $2.99 each. A yearly subscription costs $299 per year, or $24.92 per month.
The professional plan costs $99 per month, which includes 50 images per month. Additional licenses cost $1.95 each. A yearly subscription costs $999 per year, or $83.25 per month.
The team plan is designed for businesses that need multiple users to access the same account. It costs $479 per month, which includes 750 images per month. Additional licenses cost $0.99 each. A yearly subscription costs $4,788 per year, or $399 per month.
All plans come with a free trial period of one month, during which you can download up to ten images for free.
Comparison
When comparing the pricing of Adobe Stock and Shutterstock, it’s clear that both providers offer similar plans at similar prices. However, there are some differences worth noting.
Firstly, Adobe Stock’s premium plan is significantly more expensive than Shutterstock’s professional plan. While both plans offer ten images per month, Shutterstock’s plan costs $20 less per month. Additionally, Shutterstock’s professional plan offers 50 images per month, while Adobe Stock’s premium plan only offers ten.
Secondly, Shutterstock’s team plan is much more affordable than Adobe Stock’s premium plan. For almost half the price, businesses can get access to 750 images per month instead of just ten.
Lastly, both providers offer free trials, but Adobe Stock’s trial period is shorter than Shutterstock’s. While Adobe Stock offers a 30-day free trial, Shutterstock offers a one-month free trial.
Conclusion
In conclusion, when it comes to pricing, both Adobe Stock and Shutterstock offer similar plans at similar prices. However, there are some differences worth considering. If you need a lot of images per month, Shutterstock’s professional plan may be a better option as it offers 50 images per month for $20 less than Adobe Stock’s premium plan. On the other hand, if you need multiple users to access the same account, Shutterstock’s team plan is much more affordable than Adobe Stock’s premium plan. Ultimately, the choice between the two providers will depend on your specific needs and budget.
Image Quality Comparison: Adobe Stock Vs Shutterstock
When it comes to stock photography, there are two major players in the market: Adobe Stock and Shutterstock. Both platforms offer a vast collection of high-quality images, but which one is better? In this article, we will compare the image quality of Adobe Stock and Shutterstock.
Firstly, let’s talk about Adobe Stock. Adobe Stock is a relatively new player in the stock photography market, having been launched in 2015. However, it has quickly gained popularity due to its integration with Adobe Creative Cloud, making it easy for designers to access and use images directly in their projects. Adobe Stock offers over 200 million assets, including photos, illustrations, and videos.
One of the standout features of Adobe Stock is its high-quality images. The platform has strict guidelines for image submissions, ensuring that only the best images make it onto the platform. This means that you can expect to find images with excellent resolution, sharpness, and color accuracy on Adobe Stock.
Shutterstock, on the other hand, has been around since 2003 and is one of the most popular stock photography platforms in the world. It boasts an impressive collection of over 350 million images, videos, and music tracks. Shutterstock’s library includes a wide range of content, from editorial images to creative illustrations.
In terms of image quality, Shutterstock also delivers high-quality images. However, because of the sheer volume of images on the platform, the quality can vary. Some images may be of lower resolution or have issues with color accuracy. However, Shutterstock does have a team of editors who review all images before they are approved for the platform, so the overall quality is still quite good.
When it comes to comparing the image quality of Adobe Stock and Shutterstock, it’s important to note that both platforms offer high-quality images. However, Adobe Stock’s strict guidelines for image submissions mean that you can expect a higher level of consistency in terms of image quality. Shutterstock’s larger library means that there is more variety in terms of image quality, but you may need to spend more time searching for the perfect image.
Another factor to consider when comparing the image quality of Adobe Stock and Shutterstock is the type of content available on each platform. Adobe Stock focuses primarily on creative assets, such as photos and illustrations, while Shutterstock offers a wider range of content, including editorial images and footage.
In conclusion, both Adobe Stock and Shutterstock offer high-quality images, but the level of consistency may differ. Adobe Stock’s strict guidelines for image submissions mean that you can expect a higher level of consistency in terms of image quality. Shutterstock’s larger library means that there is more variety in terms of image quality, but you may need to spend more time searching for the perfect image. Ultimately, the choice between the two platforms will depend on your specific needs and preferences.
Licensing Options: Adobe Stock Vs Shutterstock
When it comes to stock photography, Adobe Stock and Shutterstock are two of the biggest names in the industry. Both offer a vast library of high-quality images, videos, and illustrations that can be licensed for commercial use. However, there are some key differences between the two platforms when it comes to licensing options.
Adobe Stock offers two main types of licenses: Standard and Extended. The Standard license allows for use in digital media, print media, and merchandise for up to 500,000 copies. It also includes the right to use the asset in social media, email marketing, and mobile advertising. The Extended license, on the other hand, allows for unlimited copies and use in products for resale, such as t-shirts or phone cases.
Shutterstock also offers two main types of licenses: Standard and Enhanced. The Standard license allows for use in digital media, print media, and merchandise for up to 500,000 copies. It also includes the right to use the asset in social media, email marketing, and mobile advertising. The Enhanced license, however, allows for unlimited copies and use in products for resale, as well as use in television and film productions.
One key difference between the two platforms is the pricing structure for their licenses. Adobe Stock offers a subscription-based model, where users pay a monthly fee for a certain number of downloads. The Standard license is included in the subscription, but the Extended license requires an additional fee. Shutterstock, on the other hand, offers both subscription and on-demand pricing options. The Standard license is included in both, but the Enhanced license requires an additional fee.
Another difference is the level of customization available for licenses. Adobe Stock allows users to customize their licenses by adding or removing restrictions based on their specific needs. For example, users can add an option for multi-seat usage or remove the restriction on use in merchandise. Shutterstock, however, does not offer this level of customization.
Both platforms also offer editorial licenses for use in news articles and documentaries. However, Adobe Stock’s editorial license is only available for select images, while Shutterstock’s editorial license is available for all images marked as editorial.
In terms of legal protection, both platforms offer indemnification for their licenses. This means that if a user is sued for using an asset from either platform, the platform will cover the legal fees and damages up to a certain amount. However, Adobe Stock offers a higher level of indemnification than Shutterstock.
Overall, both Adobe Stock and Shutterstock offer similar licensing options for their assets. However, there are some key differences in pricing, customization, and legal protection that may make one platform more suitable for certain users than the other. It’s important for businesses and individuals to carefully consider their needs and budget before choosing a platform for their stock photography needs.
Search Functionality: Adobe Stock Vs Shutterstock
When it comes to stock photography, Adobe Stock and Shutterstock are two of the biggest names in the industry. Both platforms offer a vast collection of high-quality images, videos, and illustrations that can be used for various purposes. However, one of the most critical factors that determine the success of a stock photography platform is its search functionality. In this article, we will compare the search functionality of Adobe Stock and Shutterstock to help you decide which platform is better suited for your needs.
Search Filters
Both Adobe Stock and Shutterstock offer a range of search filters that allow users to narrow down their search results based on specific criteria. For instance, users can filter images by orientation, color, size, and even the number of people in the image. However, Adobe Stock offers more advanced search filters than Shutterstock. For example, users can filter images based on the presence of specific objects or concepts, such as “coffee” or “happiness.” This feature can be particularly useful for marketers who need to find images that align with their brand messaging.
Search Suggestions
Another crucial aspect of search functionality is the ability to provide relevant search suggestions. When users type in a search query, both Adobe Stock and Shutterstock offer suggestions based on popular keywords related to the search term. However, Adobe Stock’s search suggestions are more accurate and comprehensive than Shutterstock’s. Additionally, Adobe Stock also provides visual search suggestions, where users can drag and drop an image onto the search bar to find similar images.
Search Results
The quality and relevance of search results are perhaps the most critical factors when it comes to search functionality. Both Adobe Stock and Shutterstock offer high-quality images, but Adobe Stock’s search algorithm seems to be more sophisticated than Shutterstock’s. Adobe Stock’s search results are more accurate and relevant, and the platform also offers a “best match” feature that ranks images based on their popularity and relevance to the search query.
User Interface
Finally, the user interface plays a significant role in determining the ease of use of a stock photography platform. Both Adobe Stock and Shutterstock have intuitive interfaces that make it easy for users to navigate and find what they’re looking for. However, Adobe Stock’s interface is more modern and visually appealing than Shutterstock’s. Additionally, Adobe Stock’s interface is integrated with other Adobe Creative Cloud applications, making it easier for designers to access and use images in their projects.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both Adobe Stock and Shutterstock offer excellent search functionality, but Adobe Stock seems to have an edge over Shutterstock in terms of advanced search filters, accurate search suggestions, relevant search results, and a modern user interface. However, the choice between the two platforms ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a platform with a vast collection of images and videos, Shutterstock might be a better option. On the other hand, if you’re looking for a platform that offers more advanced search features and integration with other Adobe applications, Adobe Stock might be the way to go.
Contributor Programs: Adobe Stock Vs Shutterstock
When it comes to stock photography, Adobe Stock and Shutterstock are two of the biggest names in the industry. Both platforms offer a wide range of high-quality images, videos, and illustrations for businesses and individuals to use in their marketing materials, websites, and social media posts. However, if you’re a photographer or graphic designer looking to sell your work on these platforms, you may be wondering which one is the better choice for you. In this article, we’ll compare Adobe Stock and Shutterstock’s contributor programs to help you make an informed decision.
Firstly, let’s take a look at the commission rates offered by both platforms. Adobe Stock offers contributors a 33% commission rate for photos and vectors, and a 35% commission rate for videos. On the other hand, Shutterstock offers a slightly lower commission rate of 15% for photos and vectors, and 20% for videos. While Adobe Stock’s commission rates may seem more attractive, it’s important to note that Shutterstock has a much larger customer base, which means your images are more likely to be downloaded and generate sales.
Another factor to consider is the submission process. Both platforms have strict guidelines for image quality, size, and content, but Adobe Stock’s submission process is generally considered to be more user-friendly and efficient. Contributors can upload their images directly from Adobe Lightroom or Bridge, and the platform uses artificial intelligence to automatically tag and categorize them. Shutterstock’s submission process, on the other hand, requires contributors to manually keyword and categorize their images, which can be time-consuming and tedious.
When it comes to exclusivity, Adobe Stock offers contributors the option to sell their images exclusively on their platform, which means they cannot be sold on any other stock photography website. In exchange for exclusivity, contributors receive a higher commission rate of 40% for photos and vectors, and 45% for videos. Shutterstock does not offer an exclusivity program, which means contributors are free to sell their images on multiple platforms, but they will not receive any additional benefits for doing so.
One area where Shutterstock has an advantage over Adobe Stock is in its referral program. Shutterstock offers contributors a referral bonus of $0.04 per download for every new customer they refer to the platform. This can add up quickly, especially if you have a large network of potential customers. Adobe Stock does not currently offer a referral program for contributors.
Finally, let’s talk about payment options. Both platforms offer contributors the option to receive payments via PayPal or direct deposit, but Adobe Stock also offers the option to receive payments via Payoneer, which can be a more convenient option for international contributors. Additionally, Adobe Stock pays contributors on a monthly basis, while Shutterstock pays contributors once they reach a minimum payout threshold of $35.
In conclusion, both Adobe Stock and Shutterstock offer competitive contributor programs with their own unique advantages and disadvantages. If you’re looking for a platform with higher commission rates and a more user-friendly submission process, Adobe Stock may be the better choice for you. However, if you’re looking for a platform with a larger customer base and a referral program, Shutterstock may be the way to go. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual needs and preferences as a contributor.
Customer Support: Adobe Stock Vs Shutterstock
When it comes to choosing a stock photography platform, customer support is an important factor to consider. Adobe Stock and Shutterstock are two of the most popular options in the market, and both offer different levels of customer support.
Adobe Stock offers 24/7 customer support through phone, email, and chat. They also have a comprehensive help center with articles, tutorials, and FAQs that cover a wide range of topics. Additionally, Adobe offers a community forum where users can ask questions and get answers from other users or Adobe staff.
Shutterstock, on the other hand, offers customer support through email and chat only. They do not have a phone support option. However, they do have a help center with articles and FAQs that cover a variety of topics. They also have a community forum where users can ask questions and get answers from other users.
In terms of response time, Adobe Stock’s customer support team is known for being quick and efficient. They usually respond within a few hours, if not immediately. Shutterstock’s response time is also relatively fast, but it may take longer during peak hours or weekends.
Another aspect to consider is the quality of customer support. Both Adobe Stock and Shutterstock have knowledgeable and helpful support teams. However, Adobe’s support team is known for going above and beyond to solve customer issues. They are also more proactive in reaching out to customers who may be experiencing problems.
Shutterstock’s support team is also helpful, but some users have reported that they can be slow to respond or may not provide a satisfactory solution to their problem.
Overall, when it comes to customer support, Adobe Stock has the edge over Shutterstock. Their 24/7 availability, comprehensive help center, and proactive approach make them a reliable choice for users who need assistance. However, Shutterstock’s support team is still competent and can provide adequate help to users who encounter issues.
It’s worth noting that both platforms offer extensive resources for users to troubleshoot common problems on their own. Before reaching out to customer support, users can refer to the help center, tutorials, and community forums to find solutions to their issues.
In conclusion, while customer support is an important factor to consider when choosing a stock photography platform, it should not be the only one. Other factors such as pricing, image quality, and selection should also be taken into account. Ultimately, the best platform for you will depend on your specific needs and preferences.
Integration with Creative Cloud: Adobe Stock Vs Shutterstock
When it comes to stock photography, Adobe Stock and Shutterstock are two of the most popular options available. Both platforms offer a vast selection of high-quality images, videos, and illustrations that can be used for various purposes. However, one significant difference between the two is their integration with Creative Cloud.
Adobe Stock is fully integrated with Creative Cloud, which means that users can access its library of assets directly from within Adobe’s creative applications such as Photoshop, Illustrator, and InDesign. This integration makes it easy for designers to search for and license images without having to leave their workflow. They can also preview watermarked images in their designs before purchasing them, which saves time and ensures that the final product looks exactly how they want it to.
Shutterstock, on the other hand, does not have the same level of integration with Creative Cloud. While it does offer a plugin for Adobe applications, it is not as seamless as Adobe Stock’s integration. Users need to download and install the plugin separately, and it only works with Photoshop and InDesign. Additionally, the plugin does not allow users to preview watermarked images in their designs, which can be frustrating for designers who want to see how an image will look before committing to a purchase.
Another advantage of Adobe Stock’s integration with Creative Cloud is that it offers a more streamlined licensing process. When users license an image from Adobe Stock, the license information is automatically added to the metadata of the asset. This means that designers don’t have to keep track of separate licenses or worry about accidentally using an image without proper licensing. It also makes it easier for clients to verify that all the assets used in a project are properly licensed.
Shutterstock, on the other hand, requires users to manually enter license information into the metadata of each asset they license. This can be time-consuming and prone to errors, especially when working on large projects with multiple assets. It also means that designers need to keep track of separate licenses for each asset, which can be confusing and lead to licensing issues down the line.
In terms of pricing, both Adobe Stock and Shutterstock offer similar subscription plans and pricing models. However, Adobe Stock’s integration with Creative Cloud can make it a more cost-effective option for designers who use Adobe’s creative applications regularly. With Adobe Stock, users can license images directly from within their workflow, which can save time and reduce the need for additional software or plugins.
Overall, while both Adobe Stock and Shutterstock offer high-quality stock assets, Adobe Stock’s integration with Creative Cloud gives it a significant advantage over Shutterstock. The seamless integration, streamlined licensing process, and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for designers who use Adobe’s creative applications regularly. However, if you’re not a regular user of Adobe’s creative applications, Shutterstock may still be a viable option for your stock photography needs.
User Experience Comparison: Adobe Stock Vs Shutterstock
When it comes to stock photography, Adobe Stock and Shutterstock are two of the biggest names in the industry. Both platforms offer a vast collection of high-quality images, videos, and illustrations that can be used for various purposes. However, when it comes to user experience, there are some notable differences between the two.
Firstly, let’s talk about the search functionality. Adobe Stock has a more intuitive search engine that allows users to filter their results based on various criteria such as color, orientation, and image type. The platform also offers an AI-powered visual search feature that enables users to find similar images by simply dragging and dropping an image onto the search bar. On the other hand, Shutterstock’s search engine is not as advanced as Adobe Stock’s. While it does allow users to filter their results based on various criteria, it lacks the visual search feature that Adobe Stock offers.
Another aspect where Adobe Stock excels is in its integration with other Adobe products. If you’re already using Adobe Creative Cloud, then Adobe Stock seamlessly integrates with it, allowing you to access and license images directly from within your favorite Adobe applications. This integration makes the workflow much smoother and saves time for designers who use Adobe products regularly. In contrast, Shutterstock doesn’t have any such integration with other software, which can be a drawback for those who use different tools for their design work.
When it comes to pricing, both platforms offer similar plans and pricing structures. However, Adobe Stock offers a unique subscription plan called the Creative Cloud All Apps plan, which includes access to all Adobe Creative Cloud apps, including Adobe Stock, at a discounted price. This plan is ideal for those who use multiple Adobe products and need access to a large number of stock images regularly. Shutterstock, on the other hand, offers a more straightforward pricing structure, with plans based on the number of images you need to download.
One area where Shutterstock has an edge over Adobe Stock is in its contributor program. Shutterstock has a vast network of contributors who upload new content regularly, ensuring that the platform’s library is always up-to-date with fresh and relevant content. Additionally, Shutterstock offers a higher commission rate to its contributors than Adobe Stock, which attracts more talented photographers and artists to the platform.
Finally, let’s talk about the overall user experience. Both platforms have a clean and modern interface that is easy to navigate. However, Adobe Stock’s interface is more visually appealing and user-friendly, with larger thumbnails and a more intuitive layout. Additionally, Adobe Stock offers a free trial that allows users to test the platform before committing to a subscription, which is a great way to get a feel for the platform’s features and capabilities.
In conclusion, both Adobe Stock and Shutterstock are excellent platforms for finding high-quality stock images, videos, and illustrations. However, when it comes to user experience, Adobe Stock has a slight edge over Shutterstock, thanks to its advanced search engine, integration with other Adobe products, and more user-friendly interface. That being said, Shutterstock’s contributor program and constantly updated library make it a great choice for those looking for fresh and relevant content. Ultimately, the choice between the two platforms will depend on your specific needs and preferences.
